A Direct Response to Opposition

The "Kekal Anwar" campaign gained significant public traction as a direct response to the "Turun Anwar" (Anwar Resign) rallies organized by opposition parties. The "Turun Anwar" movement, fueled by concerns over the economy, cost of living, and accusations of political persecution, has sought to undermine the legitimacy of Anwar's leadership. In this context, "Kekal Anwar" serves as a public show of confidence, demonstrating that the Prime Minister still commands a significant base of support.

The contrast between the two movements is stark. While "Turun Anwar" focuses on dissatisfaction and a desire for change, "Kekal Anwar" emphasizes stability, continuity, and the need to allow the current government to see its policies through. This was particularly evident when "Kekal Anwar" chants filled the Parliament following Anwar's presentation of the 13th Malaysia Plan, a five-year blueprint aimed at economic transformation and sustainable growth.

Goals and Key Supporters

The primary objective of the "Kekal Anwar" movement is to consolidate public and political support for Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and his Unity Government. Key supporters include:

• Government Backbenchers: Lawmakers from the ruling coalition, including Pakatan Harapan (PH) and Barisan Nasional (BN), have been at the forefront of the "Kekal Anwar" narrative, publicly defending the government's policies and leadership.

• Civil Society Groups: Some organizations, such as the Malaysian Taxi Drivers' Coalition, have organized their own rallies to show support for Anwar, citing his efforts to improve their livelihoods and create a more equitable society.

• Citizens: Many Malaysians who have grown weary of political instability and frequent changes in government see Anwar's tenure as a crucial period for the country's recovery and long-term development. They support his reform initiatives, which include judicial independence and efforts to combat corruption.

A Battle for Narrative

The "Kekal Anwar" and "Turun Anwar" movements represent a battle for narrative dominance in Malaysian politics. The opposition seeks to frame the current government as ineffective and out of touch with the people's struggles, while the pro-government side highlights its achievements in economic stabilization, and its ambitious plans for the future.

Ultimately, the longevity of the "Kekal Anwar" movement and its effectiveness in countering opposition pressure will depend on the government's ability to deliver on its promises and demonstrate tangible improvements in the lives of ordinary Malaysians. The public's perception of the government's performance on key issues such as the economy, cost of living, and institutional reforms will be the ultimate arbiter of which narrative prevails.